ovr.news

Archaeology, rediscovered knowledge, the past opening up

Devil’s Arrows stones traveled further than expected

zmescience.com · 17 September 2026
Devil’s Arrows stones traveled further than expected
Photo: zmescience.com
2 related sources

Summary and headline written by AI from the source article. How we work

Archaeologists in North Yorkshire, England, determined that the builders of the Devil’s Arrows, three large stones, hauled their materials from Brimham Rocks, 18 kilometers away.

Legend attributes the stones to a failed attempt by the Devil to destroy the town of Aldborough around 5,000 to 3,500 years ago. For decades, researchers believed the stones came from closer sources, but new geochemical analysis of mineral grains proves the stones originated at Brimham Rocks.

The research team collected samples by pressing adhesive tape onto the stones to gather microscopic mineral pieces. They then examined zircon and apatite within the samples, finding that the mineral “fingerprints” matched those from Brimham Rocks and differed from other nearby stone sources. This discovery indicates the Neolithic people who erected the Devil’s Arrows intentionally selected stones from a more distant location, requiring considerable effort to transport blocks weighing around 25 tonnes.

The study also suggests one of the missing Devil’s Arrows may have been repurposed. Researchers found matching mineral signatures in the Battle Cross at Aldborough, a medieval monument, and in the masonry of Peg Bridge, supporting historical accounts that those structures were built using stone from a fallen monolith.

This research builds on previous work tracing the origins of stones at Stonehenge to distant quarries in Wales and Scotland, demonstrating a pattern of ancient peoples transporting materials over significant distances for ceremonial structures.

Was this worth your time?
Read on zmescience.com
Surfaced by the Discovery lens — one of the vital signs ovr.news reads.
How we evaluated this

More in Discovery

Browse all Discovery articles

What made it worth it?

What's wrong with this article?