ovr.news

People thriving, health, connection

Richmond’s community program cuts gun violence

greatergood.berkeley.edu · 11 September 2026
Richmond’s community program cuts gun violence
Photo: greatergood.berkeley.edu

Summary and headline written by AI from the source article. How we work

Researchers at UC Berkeley found that Richmond, California’s Office of Neighborhood Safety (ONS) reduced firearm homicides and injury shootings by 61% over 14 years.

The study compared Richmond’s rates of gun violence to those of similar cities across the United States, estimating what would have happened without the ONS and its Peacemaker Fellowship program. They determined the Fellowship led to sustained reductions in violence that increased as the program continued operating.

The ONS uses a public health approach, employing 14 street-outreach workers who currently support 123 participants through Operation Peacemaker Fellowship. Program manager James Houston credits the success to participants making positive choices with the support of the ONS team. Despite reducing its police force from over 300 officers in 2014 to 121 in 2024, Richmond maintained and expanded the ONS through city funding and grants.

The city experienced less of an increase in gun violence during the COVID-19 pandemic than many other areas, and the ONS reports that the program improves health outcomes by saving lives, creating safer streets, and fostering a more optimistic outlook within the community. Former participants described how the program provided crucial support, leading to employment, stable housing, and positive life changes.

Researchers plan to investigate specific aspects of the ONS, such as its city government structure, consistent funding, long-term staff, and individualized support services, to understand how they contribute to its success.

Was this worth your time?
Read on greatergood.berkeley.edu
Surfaced by the Thriving lens — one of the vital signs ovr.news reads.
How we evaluated this

More in Thriving

Browse all Thriving articles

What made it worth it?

What's wrong with this article?