ovr.news
About

Originals builds seed supply chain to scale forest restoration in Brazil and Mexico

Read on valor.globo.com · 12 November 2026

Headline and summary by local AI

Originals, a platform of the Future Climate Group, established a partner network to supply native seeds and seedlings for forest restoration projects across seven regions in Brazil and Mexico.

The company currently manages a portfolio of approximately 12,000 hectares. The model combines community and industrial nurseries with long-term contracts for seed collectors to ensure genetic diversity and high-quality planting material.

Guilherme Prado, a project director at Originals, says that the primary challenge for reforestation is securing a biological base rather than just capital or land. He explains that maintaining ecological integrity requires between 60 and 80 native species per hectare, many of which fruit only once a year during short windows. To address this, Originals works with partners including Instituto Terra de Preservação Ambiental, Agência Ambiental Pick-upau, Instituto de Pesquisas Ecológicas, and Toroto in Mexico.

These long-term contracts provide nurseries with predictable demand, allowing them to invest in training and storage while ensuring the platform has the necessary volume of species. The project aligns with a national goal in Brazil to recover at least 12 million hectares of native vegetation by the end of 2030.

A study published in the journal Forests suggests that producing the required native seeds could generate up to 57,000 rural jobs and move up to US$ 146 million in economic activity. Originals uses protocols to track each seed lot from collection to planting, which helped its first implemented areas achieve a seedling survival rate of over 90% using more than 60 native species.

The company plans to reach 25,000 hectares by 2035, aiming to plant 10 million trees and remove 5 million tons of carbon.

Selected and summarized by local AI How we work

More in Recovery

Browse all Recovery articles

Anything you want to add?

What made you doubt it?

What's wrong with this article?