ovr.news

Archaeology, rediscovered knowledge, the past opening up

Lavina fontana painted nudes challenged renaissance norms

bbc.com · 18 October 2026
Lavina fontana painted nudes challenged renaissance norms
Photo: bbc.com

Summary and headline written by AI from the source article. How we work

Lavinia Fontana, a portrait painter in Renaissance Italy, was the first professional female artist to depict nude female figures in her work, creating paintings that were more suggestive and frank than those by her male contemporaries.

Fontana presented two distinct public faces. One appears in her 1577 self-portrait, showing her as a wealthy, educated, and virtuous young woman with an easel in the background, a clear sign of her pride in her profession.

The other emerges in her large painting “Minerva Putting on Her Armour,” where the nude goddess seems surprised by the viewer’s gaze. Fontana was the first female artist to gain significant recognition for her portrait work. She also received important commissions to create more than 12 religious paintings for church altars, challenging the belief that women were incapable of securing such prestigious assignments.

Her 1613 painting, commissioned by Cardinal Scipione Borghese, “Minerva Putting on Her Armour,” likely generated excitement knowing a woman created it, especially given her reputation for innovative imagery. In recent years, additional works have been attributed to Fontana, revealing that she was not only the first to paint the nude female form but also the first to create explicitly “erotic” works, often bolder than those of her male peers.

Some scholars suggest these paintings were a form of rebellion against her strict father, while others believe they were commercially motivated, or reflect her inner world. Fontana also painted secular works, like “Venus and Cupid” around 1585-1590, using jewels and sheer fabrics to heighten the sensual details.

Was this worth your time?
Read on bbc.com

More in Discovery

Browse all Discovery articles

What made it worth it?

What's wrong with this article?